How to reject Benatar's asymmetry argument
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
How to Reject any Scientific Manuscript
After a short overview of arguments pro and contra peer reviews, examples of gross misjudgement are compiled, followed by an attempt to identify some frequent, recurrent patterns of unjustified rejection of scientific manuscripts. A few specific questions are studied in more detail: the claim for still more precise and comprehensive definitions, the right way of handling "parallel theories", an...
متن کاملESSAY How to Reject Any Scientific Manuscript
After a short overview of arguments pro and contra peer reviews, examples of gross misjudgement are compiled, followed by an attempt to identify some frequent, recurrent patterns of unjustified rejection of scientific manuscripts. A few specific questions are studied in more detail: the claim for still more precise and comprehensive definitions, the right way of handling ‘‘parallel theories’’, ...
متن کاملHow to act on inconsistent news: Ignore, resolve, or reject
Inconsistencies frequently occur in news about the real-world. Some of these inconsistencies may be more significant than others, and some news may contain more inconsistencies than others. This creates problems of deciding whether to act on these inconsistencies, and if so how. Possible actions on an inconsistency in a news report include ignore the inconsistency, resolve the inconsistency, an...
متن کاملAn argument/adjunct asymmetry in wh-questions
Contra previous uniform approaches for wh-phrases, the current paper argues that there is a clear asymmetry between in-situ argument and adjunct wh-phrases with respect to Intervention Effects (IEs) in Korean and Japanese. Based on the categorical (nominal vs. adverbial) dichotomy evidenced by structural case attachment tests and formation of complex wh-expressions, different base locations for...
متن کاملHow (not) to attack the luck argument
The Luck Argument is among the most influential objections to the main brand of libertarianism about metaphysical freedom and moral responsibility. In his work, Alfred Mele [2006. Free will and luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press] develops – and then attempts to defeat – the literature’s most promising version of the Luck Argument. After explaining Mele’s version of the Luck Argument, I prese...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Bioethics
سال: 2019
ISSN: 0269-9702,1467-8519
DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12582